Various transcriptomics and peptidomics approaches have led to the discovery of potential novel peptides and peptide-encoding precursors. Purification of peptides based on a particular bioassay has also led to the identification of bioactive peptide fragments. These include anti-diuretic factor (ADF), NPLP2, NPLP3, NPLP4, ITG-containing, NVP-containing, IDL-containing peptides and various others (Hummon et al., 2006; Hauser et al., 2010; Boerjan et al., 2010; Veenstra 2014; Li et al., 2008). It is still unclear if these represent typical neuropeptides in that they are 1) produced in the nervous system 2) encoded by a larger precursor which contains a signal peptide 3) mediate their effects by activating a GPCR (or other receptor types) and 4) the mature peptide (not just the precursor) has high sequence similarity with its orthologs in other insects. Consequently, several studies have questioned their classification as neuropeptides. Thus, until additional information becomes available supporting their classification as neuropeptides, these peptides should be classified as “potential neuropeptides.”
Precursors encoding NVP and ITG-containing peptides have been identified in the honey bee Apis mellifera (Hummon et al., 2006; Boerjan et al., 2010), the silk moth Bombyx mori (Roller et al., 2008), the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum (Li et al., 2008), and Locusta migratoria (Veenstra 2014). These peptides have not been properly identified in nervous tissue and no biological activities have been assigned. Thus, it is not yet clear whether they represent bona fide neuropeptides.
Apis-ITG: ITGQGNRIF
Apis-NVP: NVPIYQEPRF
Information not available
Information not available